fax (000) 000-0000
		toll-free (000) 000-0000
The Leadership Bullshit series comprises three common leadership models that can be thought of as: Leading with War; Leading with Cheese, Fish, and Carrots; and Leading with Science. Each book can be purchased separately in print or electronic format.
			
			Leading with War: The Fallacies of Team Leadership
			
			Some say that war, however brutal and disgusting we may find it, 
			brings out the finest qualities in leaders: courage, honor, 
			integrity, and, above all, character. The lessons of war serve as 
			popular civilian leadership models. Should we study the great 
			generals of history and Lead with War? The problem is that leaders 
			and leadership principles are full of contradictions, as reflected 
			in the views of military strategists and generals the world over. 
			What we often fail to learn from history is that there are different 
			perspectives on leadership that we tend to cherry-pick as we see 
			fit. History supposedly informs the actions of the future 
			leadership, and one can no doubt be enlightened by viewing 
			leadership through a military prism. War is a profoundly human 
			experience and as such is guided by human emotions and passion. But 
			would those who have fought on our battlefields really recommend war 
			as a classroom for learning team leadership in the civilian 
			workplace? To make the best use of the insights the great historical 
			generals offer us, we must watch for source bias, place their views 
			in proper perspective, and modify the information in order to use it 
			successfully within our own organization.
			
			Leading with Cheese, Fish, and Carrots: The Propaganda of Team 
			Leadership
			
			Leadership books and seminars commonly open with anecdotal 
			stories for engrossing the listener. A reason why these books and 
			seminars are so popular, or even needed, is because the authors 
			realize that employees naturally resist change, and that management 
			will face a barrier every time they are the carriers of bad news 
			such as job cuts, pay cuts, or reorganization where employees are 
			negatively affected and forced into new positions or new duties. But 
			the reliance on anecdotes and metaphors for success can backfire by 
			making the employees feel underappreciated, or worse, insulted and 
			manipulated. At its core leadership is about understanding human 
			nature. Adolf Hitler, in Mein 
			Kampf, spoke about the “small measure of thinking power the 
			broad masses possess,” thereby reminding us that understanding human 
			nature is also an essential key to controlling it. 
			
			This book is not so much about leadership per se, as it is about how 
			to think about leadership by learning to ask the appropriate 
			questions and learning to find the appropriate answers. 
			
			 
			It explores the strengths and weaknesses of leadership propaganda, 
			motivational sayings, and groupthink.
			
			Leading with Science: The Logic of Team Leadership
			
			Reality in leadership is often what your gut tells you and not what 
			you wish for, nor what some mathematical equation or scientific 
			principle suggests. The logic of leadership is grounded in empirical 
			evidence of right or wrong behavior, and,
			yes, the leader 
			must face a level of personal risk. Successful leadership requires a 
			holistic approach supported by innovative ideas. Knowing how to 
			think rather than what to think may be the leader’s greatest asset. 
			Knowing how to think involves a conscious element of skepticism. It 
			requires awareness of biases related to previous experiences, strong 
			personal views, or current ambitions. This book explores the 
			strengths and weaknesses of team leadership from a scientific/logic 
			perspective and analyzes different ways to Lead with Science. It 
			breaks down the parts that make up a team, and demonstrates elusive 
			concepts such as why the team is not for everybody, and why there is 
			in fact an “I” in team. It discusses logic argumentation, the 
			importance of using proper definitions when communicating, and 
			getting the employees to agree with the premises. It also debunks 
			common motivational ideas and explores factors that increase 
			motivation. It ends by recognizing the selfish needs of the team, 
			and demonstrates how to achieve positive results when critiquing and 
			evaluating performance.